The Jamestown Foundation has a new article by Sunguta West on the targeting of aid agencies in Somalia. Aid groups in the country are increasingly being attacked and humanitarian operations have largely halted due to security concerns. The dangers of aid work come with the territory, but while most attacks against aid workers worldwide are robberies or mistaken identity, the attacks in Somalia, for political reasons, purposely strike against humanitarians.
According to Shaykh Muhammad: “The UN relief agencies took part in the war that resulted in the defeat of the Islamic Courts Union by giving arms, money and fuel to the forces ranged against the mujahideen… I urge the mujahideen to make relief agencies their main target because they are assisting the enemy. This struggle has started and is yet to be accomplished (Codka Nabadda Radio [The Voice of Peace], July 14; Garowe Online, July 14). [Emphasis Mine]
Insurgencies are contests for the minds and will of the population. In the eyes of insurgents, humanitarian organizations are competitors for the support of local populations. Thus, humanitarian NGOs and IGOs threaten to lose their century old, sacred position of neutrality.
Whether we like it or not, in insurgencies nobody is neutral.
No doubt high-tech, precision air strikes reduce civilian casualties. However, no technology is perfect and no human operator is error-proof. In mid July a US air strike hit an Afghan wedding convoy, mistaking it for a Taliban force. 47 civilians died in the air strike, 39 were women and children.
The issue of civilian casualties is an emotive one in Afghanistan, feeding a common perception international forces do not take enough care when launching air strikes, and undermining support for their continued presence in the country.
When the battle is over minds and wills, this kind of scene [video] must be an anomaly, not a trend.
Bill Murray from The Long War Journal has a good article about a new water distribution site in Baghdad. The $400,000 water facility will provide free water to 3,000 families and cover 60% of the need in the area. Two additional sites under construction will provide the remaining 40%. However, the most interesting fact about the facility is its location:
Water from the site, located within the walls of a US-operated Forward Operating Base, is then piped underneath the 15-foot-high reinforced concrete barriers surrounding the base to taps at a drive-through location.
In that community, Iraqis receive their water directly from a US FOB, a fact that speaks volumes about the securitization of services. Specifically, this is notable for two reasons. First, the placement of the water facility inside the FOB might very well discourage attacks, since an attack on the FOB is also, literally an attack on the community’s access to water. Second, the location gives US and Iraqi security forces full credit for providing the service. That is, the population physically visits the FOB to collect their water and knows clearly who provided it, winning hearts and minds. This point was apparently not lost on the Iraqi security forces:
As services return to the area after many years of sanctions, neglect and civil unrest, police expect increased access to information about the Shia insurgency, because the area has been a haven for arms caches and terrorist cells associated with Muqtada al Sadr’s Madhi Army and Iranian trained “Special Groups.”
Winning hearts and minds, gaining useful intelligence, and providing free, clean water to a poor community. That is a trio anyone can appreciate.
Previously, I discussed the role of providing services (health, education, sanitation, etc…) in counterinsurgency. After security, services represent a critical component in winning hearts and minds and strengthening the legitimacy of the state. With threats to personal security in Iraq on the decline (but still high), the provision of services is gaining increasing importance and this fact has not gone unnoticed by the US military.
Iraq contains a massive and intricate irrigation system of canals and pumping stations. The water it supplies and the flooding it controls are essential to the agriculturally dominated southern Iraq. Much of this canal system was left unusable after the initial 2003 invasion, either through direct damage or simply lack of maintenance. The fields the canal system supports are a sizable proportion of the Iraqi domestic economy.
The fact that a provisional reconstruction team (PRT) is repairing the irrigation canals and their pumping stations is mildly interesting, but nothing to write home about. However, what stands out is the fact that they are using a valuable security resource in an unorthodox way to do it:
In order to help the GoI monitor and maintain the canals, 2nd BCT Soldiers came up with a high-tech solution. In addition to Soldiers performing foot patrols and SoI guarding key points, 2nd BCT Soldiers regularly keep a watch on the canals with unmanned aerial vehicles.
“We’ve done this with every single canal,” Clegg said. “We had (the MoWR) supply us a map, showing the direction of flow. Then we stepped it up with UAV coverage. This actually allowed us to see where the water is flowing.” [Emphasis mine]
Clegg says the images are declassified and shown to MoRW officials every week to give them the information they need.
Simply put, the PRT is using UAV surveillance flights to monitor the status of irrigation canal flows. This is the first example I have found of UAVs being used in a non-security function to improve services to Iraqi civilians. The use of UAVs, a much prized resource amongst commanders, hints at the new importance placed on providing services (particularly water); a ’service surge’ if you will. It is also a reminder of the remarkable flexibility of the US military.
Last month, American and Iraqi forces launched a major push into the Sadr City section of Baghdad. The operations led to intense fighting and crippled Sadr City’s already flimsy infrastructure. As a result, large swaths of Sadr City are currently without trash collection, sewer systems, electricity, food, and access to health services.
The situation in Sadr city represents not only a humanitarian disaster, but also a direct threat to winning hearts and minds. Michael Gordon, in his New York Times article, points out the problem:
On Saturday, three Sadr City residents gingerly approached an American Army position to deliver a warning: Unless the Iraqi government or its American partner did something to restore essential services and remove the piles of garbage, the militias would gain more support.
…
“Through a ‘Hezbollah-like’ scheme, the Shiite Sadrist movement has established itself as the main service provider in the country,” notes a recent report by Refugees International, an advocacy group. “As a result of the importance of nonstate actors in the delivery of assistance and security, civilians are joining militias.”
The lack of infrastructure, sanitation, and health services offer opportunities for militias to move quickly, winning hearts and minds by merely providing token services to residents. While the Iraqi government can provide greater levels of support, militias can provide support right now. For example, the Iraqi government is promising $150 million to bolster Sadr City’s infrastructure, however, it will not do so until the security situation improves. The speed of the Sadrists allows them to compete against the Iraqi government for public support at a fraction of the cost. That is, in the battle for hearts and minds, $100 today is worth more than a $10,000 a year from now.
The Long War Journal has a gallery of photos from the Sayafiyah Combined Medical Engagement (CME) clinic.
The CME was set up as an outreach program to provide needed medical care and help establish Coalition forces as an agent of goodwill amongst the people in Sayafiyah and Al Sur. The 5/7 Cav has conducted numerous CMEs during its time in Iraq, which helped the CME in Sayafiyah to come together smoothly.
The key to hearts and minds is jobs and health care. If the US is serious about rebuilding its image in the world, these medical operations must be more than token photo-ops and be placed at the core of US global strategy.